f90x wrote:You know, If it wasn't for the v-tec (which I love in my car Incidentally) and the stoopid linked brakes, a VFR would have been a real alternative to my 'S' I really gelled with the 'S' last Sunday. Had a great ride and I'm now 600 miles into ownership.
That's the problem with Honda - they have the knack of producing some engineering marvels yet f*ck a bike up by trying to over-complicate things. V-tec is a good case in point - it's a cure to a problem that wasn't there, and doesn't cure it anyway, the end resultit makes a good bike worse. As I and others have been saying for years; all they needed to do was punch the motor out to 900-1000cc or so, lose the silly valve system and go back to gear-driven cams.
Linked brakes? I was a total cynic where these were concerned but now, having got used to them (in fact I hardly noticed them to start with) they're brilliant. Totally fuss-free braking - don't even bother using the 'rear' brake pedal, no need to, so well balanced the brakes are by just using the 'front'.
A VFR1000 is quite an exciting prospect - all it needs is the V-tec junking, the geared cams re-inserting, and belt drive. Oh...and can we have the RC30/45 firing pattern too so it doesn't sound like a CB500 with a duff plug lead?