
Can anyone recommend a place or person who can remove the old balljoint from the bridge and fit a new one? Perferably N London or Hertfordshire but I guess I can send it anywhere.
Thanks.
Moderators: slparry, Gromit, Paul
But you're talking about the small nut on top (that attaches the balljoint to the wishbone) being loose. I'm talking about play in the joint itself.gus wrote:You sure the ball joint is worn or was was it not tight.I would say it was the latter,as i had to retighten mine every 10,000 miles or so.
Yes.winger wrote:Firstlt are we talking bottom fork yoke and ball joint?? is that what you mean by bridge??
I'm guessing that getting the old one undone is the least challenging part - how about tightening up the new one? 270NM is very hard to achieve by guesswork in a vice!winger wrote:If so you'll have to find a big vice,buy one they ain't exspensive,turn the yoke upside down place in vice gripping the hexagon part of the ball joint,get an iron bar or similar place diagonal and put some prssure on,haveing tried all sort of things with big sockets,ajustables,took it into work bet it took all of ten seconds to get off,they did both mine and mr Sheens.
More than one person has recommended a spanner rather than a socket with a breaker bar. I'm not quite sure whybigblackfalco wrote:no special tools needed...just a big f\off spannah!
I completely agree that it shouldn't have failed after such little mileage, however there is noticeable 'looseness' in some areas of the joint's movement. I've compared it with a new one (at the dealer) and while there isn't yet what I'd call play in it, it is considerably less resistant to movement than it should be. While the forks are off the bike I'd rather replace it - 'looseness' will otherwise become play, Sod's law dictating that this will be during my month's stay in Italy during which time the bike will cover several thousand miles without me having access to my own tools. I'd rather do the job now in the comfort of my own garage while I have another bike to ride than entrust the S (which for the month of June will be my only form of transport) to a Florentine bike-butcher with nothing but a crowbar and a lump hammer......bigblackfalco wrote:I very much doubt it has failed after 11K miles, like Gus says prob just needs tightening.
sproggy wrote:But you're talking about the small nut on top (that attaches the balljoint to the wishbone) being loose. I'm talking about play in the joint itself.gus wrote:You sure the ball joint is worn or was was it not tight.I would say it was the latter,as i had to retighten mine every 10,000 miles or so.
Yes.winger wrote:Firstlt are we talking bottom fork yoke and ball joint?? is that what you mean by bridge??
I'm guessing that getting the old one undone is the least challenging part - how about tightening up the new one? 270NM is very hard to achieve by guesswork in a vice!winger wrote:If so you'll have to find a big vice,buy one they ain't exspensive,turn the yoke upside down place in vice gripping the hexagon part of the ball joint,get an iron bar or similar place diagonal and put some prssure on,haveing tried all sort of things with big sockets,ajustables,took it into work bet it took all of ten seconds to get off,they did both mine and mr Sheens.
More than one person has recommended a spanner rather than a socket with a breaker bar. I'm not quite sure whybigblackfalco wrote:no special tools needed...just a big f\off spannah!![]()
I completely agree that it shouldn't have failed after such little mileage, however there is noticeable 'looseness' in some areas of the joint's movement. I've compared it with a new one (at the dealer) and while there isn't yet what I'd call play in it, it is considerably less resistant to movement than it should be. While the forks are off the bike I'd rather replace it - 'looseness' will otherwise become play, Sod's law dictating that this will be during my month's stay in Italy during which time the bike will cover several thousand miles without me having access to my own tools. I'd rather do the job now in the comfort of my own garage while I have another bike to ride than entrust the S (which for the month of June will be my only form of transport) to a Florentine bike-butcher with nothing but a crowbar and a lump hammer......bigblackfalco wrote:I very much doubt it has failed after 11K miles, like Gus says prob just needs tightening.
I used a vice and a rubber mallet - worked a treat once I got the vice done up tight enough not to let the thing jump out.winger wrote:Went the socket and spanner route with mine,had egg on my face when i saw it turned upside down tightened in a vice,said bar placed diagonly and came apart easy peasy and was put back the same way.
There was no noticeable deterioration in the way the balljoint was working on the bike, but having removed the forks and discovered that it was looser than it should be I decided it was better to change it now while the front end was apart than when it started to have an effect on the bike's behaviour.winger wrote:As for wear hmm,ownly way to tell,have bike put back together on front brake and rock the bike backwards and forwards,and see whats moveing,must say i'd go with the other two had same problem it had come undone.
It had its 600 mile service in 2002, 6000 mile service in October 2005 (dry-stored in between while owner was in the far East) both at Park Lane. Since I bought it privately in June 2006 it hasn't been near a dealer. I doubt that it's been swapped.bogblackfalco wrote:Sounds like someone may have 'borrowed' your nice ball joint in place of their shagged one?! .......has it been in a dealers of late?
That's enough evidence for me. Almost certainly the ball joint has been swapped whilst the bike was in for a service.spraggy wrote:It had its 600 mile service in 2002, 6000 mile service in October 2005 (dry-stored in between while owner was in the far East) both at Park Lane. Since I bought it privately in June 2006 it hasn't been near a dealer. I doubt that it's been swapped.bigblackfalco wrote:Sounds like someone may have 'borrowed' your nice ball joint in place of their shagged one?! .......has it been in a dealers of late?
What would be the point for a main dealer to swap components? I don't believe that happened - I think this was just a sub-standard component that started to wear prematurely - possibly through lack of lubricant during manufacture.bigblackfalco wrote:That's enough evidence for me. Almost certainly the ball joint has been swapped whilst the bike was in for a service.
There is 0% chance of failiure of a ball joint at such a low mileage.
Bailey.