5" vs 5.5"

Got a technical query? Found another 0.02bhp? Ask/tell the world.

Moderators: slparry, Gromit, Paul

User avatar
sproggy
Posts: 424
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 8:41 am
Location: Welwyn Garden City

5" vs 5.5"

Post by sproggy »

We should all want the 5.5" rear, right? Because it was an extra cost option when new it must be better, the logic is supposed to go. Is it really?

My bike came with a 5.5" rear and even with a GS torque arm and liberal doses of rear preload it's still not the quickest turning bike in the world. Logic suggests that a 170/60 rear tyre on a 5" rim should help it turn more easily, but how much more easily? What are the REAL benefits of a 180 rear tyre other than looking good (?) outside the pub/cafe?

Has anyone ridden bikes with both widths of wheel and been able to tell the difference?
User avatar
throttlemeister
Posts: 1023
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 9:35 pm
Location: Netherlands
Contact:

Post by throttlemeister »

I never rode the S with both rims, but I had both a 5" and a 5.5" rim for my VFR, and on that bike I barely noticed any difference.

The advantage, besides the esthetical is more grip at extreme lean angles due to a larger contact patch. That said, if you need that you should really consider taking the bike to the track..
User avatar
Boxered
Route Master
Posts: 3079
Joined: Sat Jun 26, 2004 4:44 pm
Location: Sintelinns

Post by Boxered »

I reckon it's just pose value, some magazine roadtests said as much, but it really does look much better with the 5.5" rim

Steve
Well-weathered leather
Hot metal and oil
The scented country air
Sunlight on chrome
The blur of the landscape
Every nerve aware
User avatar
nab 301
Member
Posts: 2375
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 6:41 pm
Location: Dublin Ireland

Re: 5" vs 5.5"

Post by nab 301 »

sproggy wrote:We should all want the 5.5" rear, right? Because it was an extra cost option when new it must be better, the logic is supposed to go. Is it really?

My bike came with a 5.5" rear and even with a GS torque arm and liberal doses of rear preload it's still not the quickest turning bike in the world. Logic suggests that a 170/60 rear tyre on a 5" rim should help it turn more easily, but how much more easily? What are the REAL benefits of a 180 rear tyre other than looking good (?) outside the pub/cafe?

Has anyone ridden bikes with both widths of wheel and been able to tell the difference?
First off I wouldn't consider myself a quick rider plus i've never done a track day. I ended up with a 5.5" wheel because my local dealer was clearing out old stock and offered me one at silly money, second ,180 tyres are generally more readily availible (and better priced) and thirdly after riding both I reckon there is a noticeable difference in side grip.(the 5.5"is better)
Nigel B
Last edited by nab 301 on Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
_________________
Nigel

Keep smiling, it makes people wonder what you've been up to!
1999 R1100s (mandarin) '
2018 DL 250V Strom
2019 CB125F Honda.
MZ301 Saxon Fun ( currently retired)
'03 Bullet 65 project..
User avatar
Gromit
Posts: 5702
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2004 8:33 pm
Location: Lincs, me duck

Post by Gromit »

The 5.5 looks better.

End of ;)
User avatar
sproggy
Posts: 424
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 8:41 am
Location: Welwyn Garden City

Post by sproggy »

Gromit wrote:The 5.5 looks better.
Good enough for me :lol:

I suspect that when I get a nice rounded profile tyre on the back (the existing one's so square the bike'll almost stand up on its own...) I'll stop having doubts about the bike's ability to go around corners.
Post Reply Previous topicNext topic