Over - reading
Moderators: slparry, Gromit, Paul
Over - reading
I've noticed BMW speedo's are particularly bad for this.
Every one I've had was over - reading.
The worst was a K1100RS which was a reading good 10mph under out from 70mph.
My current car over reads by 2/3moh, and my Yamaha Thunderace is pretty much bang on.
However my R1100RS is a reading a consistent 6mph over from 30mph all the way up.
I'm using GPS to compare, which I assume is the most accurate way of gauging speed.
Every one I've had was over - reading.
The worst was a K1100RS which was a reading good 10mph under out from 70mph.
My current car over reads by 2/3moh, and my Yamaha Thunderace is pretty much bang on.
However my R1100RS is a reading a consistent 6mph over from 30mph all the way up.
I'm using GPS to compare, which I assume is the most accurate way of gauging speed.
Speedos are allowed by law to over-read, but not under read. I can't remember if it was law or a guideline, but I seem to remember that max allowable over-read was 7%.
GPS speed is pretty accurate, whereas your speedo has to be designed to allow for different tyres, tread depths, pressures etc, all of which can have a cumulative effect.
10mph at 70 is a lot, but I'm not that surprised. My old Ducati was pretty poor too. Thinking about it, there are probably more variables that could affect the reading on a motorbike, with allowance for tyre sizes, profiles and the fact the effective radius changes as you corner that would have to be designed into a mechanical system.
GPS speed is pretty accurate, whereas your speedo has to be designed to allow for different tyres, tread depths, pressures etc, all of which can have a cumulative effect.
10mph at 70 is a lot, but I'm not that surprised. My old Ducati was pretty poor too. Thinking about it, there are probably more variables that could affect the reading on a motorbike, with allowance for tyre sizes, profiles and the fact the effective radius changes as you corner that would have to be designed into a mechanical system.
Last edited by Herb on Thu Nov 24, 2016 8:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
********Jim********
---------------------------
2006 'Colgate' R1200s
---------------------------
2006 'Colgate' R1200s
Great answerHerb wrote:Speedos are allowed by law to over-read, but not under read. I can't remember if it was law or a guideline, but I seem to remember that max allowable over-read was 7%.
GPS speed is pretty accurate, whereas your speedo has to be designed to allow for different tyres, tread depths, pressures etc, all of which can have a cumulative effect.
10mph at 70 is a lot, but I'm not that surprised. My old Ducati was pretty poor too. Thinking about it, there are probably more variables that could affect the reading on a motorbike, with allowance for tyre sizes, profiles and the fact the effective radius changes as you corner that would have to be designed into a mechanical system.
Cheers for that

In fact, I think there’s a EU law that says that it’s mandatory for speedos to be a little bit on the over-read side of true speed.Herb wrote:Speedos are allowed by law to over-read, but not under read. I can't remember if it was law or a guideline, but I seem to remember that max allowable over-read was 7%.
Haven’t checked my bikes, but the car I had earlier (M-B E430) showed ca 3 km/h too much regardless of speed. It was clear that it had a built-in over-read feature.
R1100S '04
K100RS '90
GSX1100 (1327cc) '81
Lada Niva '12
CCDV '72
K100RS '90
GSX1100 (1327cc) '81
Lada Niva '12
CCDV '72
It's type-approval - 10% over 0% under. There has to be a tolerance because different tyre profiles/pressures/states of wear means that there will always be a possibility of variation from new. That tolerance can't be 'under' obviously or you could be speeding in the belief that you're observing the law, so they allow for 10% over.Herb wrote:Speedos are allowed by law to over-read, but not under read. I can't remember if it was law or a guideline, but I seem to remember that max allowable over-read was 7%.
Up to 10% optimistic is average but Enfields seem to be consistently in the 20% optimistic bracket. It always makes me smile when I hear a new Enfield owner suggesting that their pride and joy can "cruise" at 70mph 

_________________
Nigel
Keep smiling, it makes people wonder what you've been up to!
1999 R1100s (mandarin) '
2018 DL 250V Strom
2019 CB125F Honda.
MZ301 Saxon Fun ( currently retired)
'03 Bullet 65 project..
Nigel
Keep smiling, it makes people wonder what you've been up to!
1999 R1100s (mandarin) '
2018 DL 250V Strom
2019 CB125F Honda.
MZ301 Saxon Fun ( currently retired)
'03 Bullet 65 project..
I had a K1100RS that was under by 10mph at 70.nab 301 wrote:Up to 10% optimistic is average but Enfields seem to be consistently in the 20% optimistic bracket. It always makes me smile when I hear a new Enfield owner suggesting that their pride and joy can "cruise" at 70mph
It took me a while for the penny to drop.
The old K bikes are quite noisy, and do feel like they're going faster than they actually are.
I couldn't understand why all of a sudden I was spending most of my motorway time in the loser lane being overtaken by pretty much everything.