70 section rear tyre

Got a technical query? Found another 0.02bhp? Ask/tell the world.

Moderators: slparry, Gromit, Paul

Motocod
Posts: 366
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 10:47 am

70 section rear tyre

Post by Motocod »

I read recently about using a 70 section rear tyre as a means of increasing the rear ride height. Just wondering if anyone has tried it on their R1100S?

Nik
User avatar
Bikerhoss
Member
Posts: 753
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2011 10:26 am
Location: Kinneff, Aberdeenshire

Post by Bikerhoss »

:? oooh, I'd have thought going from 55 to 70 would mean some serious hugger/swingarm clearance problems, No?

After-thought - 5.5 rim or other? 55 or 60 profile to start with? :oops: Let me get my ruler
Blame the Deed, Not the Breed
Traitor Z1000SX Owner
User avatar
Merecat
Member
Posts: 538
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 12:03 pm
Location: Leicestershire

Post by Merecat »

Would a 70 fit on the rim without seriously deforming the profile?
Mick

2001 R1100s Frost Blue

Its not going the fastest,

Its stopping the quickest
User avatar
slparry
Moderator
Posts: 6730
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2008 7:19 pm
Location: Wrexham
Contact:

Post by slparry »

isn't it simpler to just change the paralever torque arm?
--
Steve Parry


Current fleet: '14 F800GS, '87 R80RS, '03 R1100S BoxerCup, '15 R1200RT LE Dynamic, '90 K1, '05 K1200S
Motocod
Posts: 366
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 10:47 am

Post by Motocod »

Presumably as I am already running the Sport spec I can't get a shorter torque arm, short of making one (still an option). Just thought I'd ask the question to see if anyone had tried it.

I need a new rear tyre anyway, and could make for a useful bit of additional ride height.
conkerman
Posts: 500
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:10 pm
Location: He's behind you. Oxon.

Post by conkerman »

I'd be very, very wary of doing this.

The higher profile tyre may take away a lot of the benefit of the rear ride height.

Personally, I ton't mess about with tyre sizes as you can bugger up the handling of your bike.
Gary
User avatar
eyore
Member
Posts: 1046
Joined: Wed May 08, 2013 8:25 am
Location: Ireland

Post by eyore »

conkerman wrote:I'd be very, very wary of doing this.

The higher profile tyre may take away a lot of the benefit of the rear ride height.

Personally, I ton't mess about with tyre sizes as you can bugger up the handling of your bike.
That's too technical for me.................. :P :P
2009 Triumph Speed Triple
2006 Aprilia Tuono RSVR
Corvus
Posts: 1406
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:19 pm
Location: Yorkshire

Post by Corvus »

Hi

Bear in mind that, in addition to the considerations already mentioned, the larger aspect ratio will affect the gearing. It will also affect the suspension characteristics, front and rear, I reckon.

It might contact something before bottoming out too.

The tyre should fit the rim, but I'd think twice about doing it.

Maxton offer shocks with adjustable ride height facility, separate from the preload, I think?

Cheers.
User avatar
Dai wiskers
Member
Posts: 1262
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2012 7:21 pm
Location: Caerphilly

Post by Dai wiskers »

Just had a look at the pic's of your bike yup you have the shorter torque arm
70 section tyre no not something that i would try
Can't help asking why do you want to raise the rear the set up you have is plenty tall enough for most people
My bike shines when it rains!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Dyslexic Dai


Steptoe
http://www.gsshop.biz/


Dan Cata
http://boxer-upgrades.webs.com/


Lennie
http://www.boxer-performance.com/index.html
Motocod
Posts: 366
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 10:47 am

Post by Motocod »

Oooh you're a conservative bunch!! :lol:

I'm 6 foot 2, so I can cope with a bit more ride height. I'm just looking to get the bike turning quicker, and trying to make it feel a little less super-tanker-ish. It feels very long and very low at the back. If it had conventional forks I'd be dropping the yokes down by 15mm...

A new shock is out of the question for me at the moment, but maybe next year...

In the meantime I'm thinking about the trackday I have booked in September, and making the bike as much fun as it can be.

Nik
User avatar
slparry
Moderator
Posts: 6730
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2008 7:19 pm
Location: Wrexham
Contact:

Post by slparry »

of course going to a rwb bcr would be more than tall enough for you as std :)
--
Steve Parry


Current fleet: '14 F800GS, '87 R80RS, '03 R1100S BoxerCup, '15 R1200RT LE Dynamic, '90 K1, '05 K1200S
User avatar
R-man
Member
Posts: 207
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 10:47 am
Location: East Suffolk
Contact:

Post by R-man »

We may be square or conservative, however I'd also shy from using a taller section tyre than standard because it would mean riding around/off the side slope on harder corners. Not much point in slightly speeding up the steering, if youre gonna have a moment in the best part of the next corner is there?

Suggest a far better way of getting the S to steer quickly is to go to the design point, = the steering angle set in the Telelever front wishbone...see our ingenious experimenters at http://bit.ly/1dCHbHc and if you need more, go to the source (Pelican Parts forum).

And we haven't talked about countersteering yet!

have fun
R1100S current
K1200RS (2005-07) Autobahn-stormer
V-Strom (2004-05)
VFR800 (2003-04)
-in the 70s & 80s there were lots more...
Motocod
Posts: 366
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 10:47 am

Post by Motocod »

Would this be a good time to start an oil or tyre thread? :lol:

Nik
User avatar
Bikerhoss
Member
Posts: 753
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2011 10:26 am
Location: Kinneff, Aberdeenshire

Post by Bikerhoss »

Motocod wrote:Would this be a good time to start an oil or tyre thread? :lol:

Nik
Image
Blame the Deed, Not the Breed
Traitor Z1000SX Owner
Motocod
Posts: 366
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 10:47 am

Post by Motocod »

In all seriousness, the clearance with the swingarm looks a bit tight.

However, the Rockster wishbone sounds interesting. I guess I'll have to keep an eye on ebay.

Nik
Post Reply Previous topicNext topic