Who's is that? Too young a car for you - that's for sureboxerscott wrote:Funny that, there`s one on my drive as we speak.Blackal wrote:Honda S2000 ....... Cracking car![]()
Al

Moderators: slparry, Gromit, Paul
Fixed that for you, although I guess it depends on your definition of "properly"!GRAgusta wrote: The only car in popular memory to work properly with the challenged rear engine configuration is the Volkswagen (Beetle) and it's derivatives, including the Porsche 356 & 911 ...
I had the pleasure of working for Porsche a few years ago. One of the courses I did included a driving day in all of their models, including the (then new) 997. The professional driver would sit by you and talk you round the track, including a part where you would try to get the car to misbehave on the skid pan. All good fun - car handled very well and didn't lose it on the wet stuff. Had me thinking that I was a driving God, of course.Gromit wrote: ....despite knowing that the foibles of its forebears have largely been eradicated, I still wouldn't trust it. Saying that I'd still have one over any Ferrari.
My neighbour has a mint metallic charcoal one with red leather, looks very pretty. He rates it highly reckons the handling is awesomeTwinspark wrote:Sadly, horrendously expensive to insure.Blackal wrote:Honda S2000 ....... Cracking car![]()
Al
(Double what my MX5 costs)
To be honest - I never looked beyond the performance/style/purchase priceTwinspark wrote:Sadly, horrendously expensive to insure.Blackal wrote:Honda S2000 ....... Cracking car![]()
Al
(Double what my MX5 costs)
It costs me near enough the equivalent to that to insure My 1.0L shopping trolley, admittedly with no recent car history.Twinspark wrote: I quoted on an S2000 recently - nearly 400 quid. I find that hard to swallow for a weekend toy.