Page 1 of 2
I do fancy one of these RC8's :)
Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 6:52 pm
by slparry
Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 7:06 pm
by Boxered
Me Too, and very affordable as a used machine.......
Funnily enough I was looking at one only yesterday at my local dealers!
Steve
Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 7:10 pm
by Blackal
Me too
Had a look on Ebay and Biketrader at the prices - really cheap.
A lot of bike - for the money
Al

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 7:30 pm
by cornishflat
I like that video, that near on high side...jeez and pulling wheelies when overtaking pure class. Its an attractive alternative that i can see the appeal for especially for oddball BMW pilots...nice

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 8:38 pm
by eyore
I thought I fancied one too till I rode it but the engine was a huge disappointment.
Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 9:09 pm
by slparry
eyore wrote:I thought I fancied one too till I rode it but the engine was a huge disappointment.
Oooo why?
Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 9:36 pm
by herrman
slparry wrote:eyore wrote:I thought I fancied one too till I rode it but the engine was a huge disappointment.
Oooo why?
Cos the 12s is better

I also fancy the RC8--Must be a BMW thing!!!
Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 9:37 pm
by eyore
slparry wrote:eyore wrote:I thought I fancied one too till I rode it but the engine was a huge disappointment.
Oooo why?
Just dosent have the torque a V twin should have, needs The nuts revved off it and the gearbox worked hard which is weird .Totally unlike my 998s which feels as if it will crease tarmac.
I believe the RC8R is a lot better but havent tried one.
Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 9:57 pm
by Blackal
I know I posted this photo before, but can't find the thread............
Absolutely stunning !
Al

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 10:09 pm
by Twinspark
No, doesn't work for me.
Another one of these bikes with angles and edges all over the place, but no 'flow' to the styling.
Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 6:27 am
by conkerman
Avoid any non twin spark bikes, crap fuelling and much less desirable than the later ones.
Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 7:12 am
by eyore
Twinspark wrote:No, doesn't work for me.
Another one of these bikes with angles and edges all over the place, but no 'flow' to the styling.
Agree, the styling will "age" appallingly .
Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 7:07 pm
by pbikerharry
On reading the two reports in Ride the later model had better maping,gearbox, and clutch. Much better than the early models.
Pete
Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 7:18 pm
by nab 301
I do know someone who bought cheap at the start of summer and is no longer an owner. They seem to have plenty of room for the larger rider , this one (maybe it was a bad example ) apparently vibrated badly through the rev range and had a few technical issues, . He's back on a blade at the moment..
Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 8:32 pm
by jeznewsome
My '10 RC8 was a flipping missile. Lumpy at low revs but definately not short of midrange. Lumpiness was tamed with a different map.
A very fast machine, in fact a little too fast really. It never liked going slowly.