Page 4 of 4
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 7:55 pm
by nab 301
Vince wrote:Well...
Before 88.18 BHP @ 7475.7 RPM
After 103.04 BHP @7707 RPM
Torques
Before 71.26 Ft/lb @ 6048
After 80.49 Ft/lb @ 6054
Very nice feeling rolling the throttle on now, as it should be IMO.
\v/
Sounds incredible
Can you let us know how the fuel consumption works out over the next few weeks?
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 9:32 pm
by Vince
Will do, however, intial readings indicat no worse for the moment and I'm finding I'm loving the feeling of the smooth motor in 4th at legal speeds.
\v/
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 12:49 pm
by Triton
I would really like to subject my R1200ST (aka the Black Beast) to this treatment but its a long way from Scotland to Hilltop.
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 1:06 pm
by Vince
Intial MPG is about 3MPG improvment according to the OBC.
Once I've done a few tankfulls I'll know what it's really doing tho the winter usually drops it a bit anyway.
\v/
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 1:07 pm
by Vince
Triton wrote:I would really like to subject my R1200ST (aka the Black Beast) to this treatment but its a long way from Scotland to Hilltop.
I can see the problem there. Your going to have to stop far to many times on the way back to relax your (facial) cheek muscules
\v/
Posted: Tue May 21, 2013 3:57 pm
by Vince
An update on this for those that asked about MPG.
Due to my addiction to winding on the throttle, I seem to have a average 10% increase in fuel used per mile and less miles from a rear tyre.
I note that when I'm behind a slow associate that the fuel consumption does decrease giving more MPG, so I suspect it's not the new maps fault but rather my throttle hands fault
I wouldn't go back mind.
Bikes on 80,000 miles now as well, going better than it ever has.
\v/