New film scans.
Moderators: Gromit, Paul, slparry
New film scans.
Kodak Ektar 100 (mono PP in LR5)
Scan-150209-0001
Scan-150214-0010
Fuji Provia 100:
scan-2015-02-25-0001
All Olympus OM-2n
Scan-150209-0001
Scan-150214-0010
Fuji Provia 100:
scan-2015-02-25-0001
All Olympus OM-2n
A few from the negs which arrived back from the processor yesterday:
2015-03-03-0011
2015-03-03-0025
2015-03-03-0016
2015-03-03-0010
All Kodak Ektar 100
Olympus OM-2n/28-f3.5
2015-03-03-0011
2015-03-03-0025
2015-03-03-0016
2015-03-03-0010
All Kodak Ektar 100
Olympus OM-2n/28-f3.5
Thanks Steve - it's been quite a long slog getting my head around the scanner settings but I'm quite pleased with the results now. More by luck than judgement I should add!
Now Adobe have updated their raw converter for the Fuji X-Trans sensor the images are looking loads better, and because of the way the sensor works (ie it's a random RGB array) it mimics film quite well. Still not quite the same obviously - as you rightly say, film does have a 'feel' which is very easy on the eye. So glad I took the plunge.
Bit miffed with the processing firm though. Their turn-around is very quick (posted the film off saturday, it arrived back here yesterday - tues) but the negs have a lot of spotting/crud and long straight scratches. Makes me think not enough care is taken loading the film onto the spools in the processing tank (or whatever's used) perhaps. No complaints with the IQ though.
Now Adobe have updated their raw converter for the Fuji X-Trans sensor the images are looking loads better, and because of the way the sensor works (ie it's a random RGB array) it mimics film quite well. Still not quite the same obviously - as you rightly say, film does have a 'feel' which is very easy on the eye. So glad I took the plunge.
Bit miffed with the processing firm though. Their turn-around is very quick (posted the film off saturday, it arrived back here yesterday - tues) but the negs have a lot of spotting/crud and long straight scratches. Makes me think not enough care is taken loading the film onto the spools in the processing tank (or whatever's used) perhaps. No complaints with the IQ though.
One from a few I took yesterday, needed to use a roll of Ektar 100 up which has been languishing in the OM2. Just some minimal processing to add a little punch to the image.
Bass Maltings Ektar
OM-2n/Zuiko 28-f3.5/Ektar 100
Bass Maltings Ektar
OM-2n/Zuiko 28-f3.5/Ektar 100
Thanks Mitch - these old buildings have stood derilict for years now, but were once the Maltings used by Bass Brewers. Trouble is, they attract vandals/arsonists on a tragically regular basis and as a result they're fenced off to the normal law-abiding public. Would be a photographer's dream to wander in amongst the buildings themselves - what you see in the photo is only a small part of the complex.
Couple more - both off OM-2n/Zuiko 28/Kodak Ektar 100:
Bass Maltings Ektar 3
Bass Maltings Ektar 2
Couple more - both off OM-2n/Zuiko 28/Kodak Ektar 100:
Bass Maltings Ektar 3
Bass Maltings Ektar 2
-
- Member
- Posts: 3625
- Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2005 4:35 am
- Location: North East
f90x wrote:Nice Richard. Really is a shame you can't get in there.
It is, Steve - saw a group of lads clamber through the fence whilst I was there. They re-appeared 15 mins later on top of the main water tower - sadly I haven't got the nerve to do the same and if I did, I'm the sort of person who'd get caught by security.
Gromit wrote:f90x wrote:Nice Richard. Really is a shame you can't get in there.
It is, Steve - saw a group of lads clamber through the fence whilst I was there.... sadly I haven't got the nerve to do the same and if I did, I'm the sort of person who'd get caught by security.
Or get mugged by the group of lads!!
DT
Ride like your life depended on it.
2002 BCR
2002 BCR
-
- Member
- Posts: 3625
- Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2005 4:35 am
- Location: North East
Return to “Photographer's Corner”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 59 guests