Smaller wheels. It's the way forwards.

Got a technical query? Found another 0.02bhp? Ask/tell the world.

Moderators: slparry, Gromit, Paul

Corvus
Posts: 1406
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:19 pm
Location: Yorkshire

Smaller wheels. It's the way forwards.

Post by Corvus »

http://charming.awardspace.com/otto_die ... orque.html

This guy says that smaller wheels increase the forward thrust.

True?

My own thoughts are "yes and no"
User avatar
Merecat
Member
Posts: 538
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 12:03 pm
Location: Leicestershire

Post by Merecat »

Maybe, but with a smaller wheel any gain in tractive power would be negated by the loss of top end speed.
and with a passage like this:

And how much torque is there on engine shaft? Well this depends on your engine capabilities and how much throttle you give.
Engine capabilities are described with torque curve. Torque curve tells what is the maximum torque (that is, ‘on full throttle’) the engine can produce at any given engine revs.


Which I disagree with, I lost interest and stopped reading.

Ill keep with the wheels I already have :)
Mick

2001 R1100s Frost Blue

Its not going the fastest,

Its stopping the quickest
conkerman
Posts: 500
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:10 pm
Location: He's behind you. Oxon.

Post by conkerman »

+1.

A small change in gearing.

Compared to the aggro finding tyres I'd look at other ways to do it.
Gary
User avatar
slparry
Moderator
Posts: 6730
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2008 7:19 pm
Location: Wrexham
Contact:

Post by slparry »

The Japanese widely went down to 16" wheels in the 80's and I for one hated them, they always seemed prone to feeling like they were tucking under.

The current 17" seems a much better compromise :)
--
Steve Parry


Current fleet: '14 F800GS, '87 R80RS, '03 R1100S BoxerCup, '15 R1200RT LE Dynamic, '90 K1, '05 K1200S
Corvus
Posts: 1406
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:19 pm
Location: Yorkshire

Post by Corvus »

Merecat wrote:Maybe, but with a smaller wheel any gain in tractive power would be negated by the loss of top end speed.
.........
That was pretty much my "yes and no".

You'd have to raise the transmission gearing to achieve reasonable speeds, which would negate the mechanical advantage of the smaller rolling radius. Keep the gearing low and you risk breaking traction anyway.

But I think the guy is right to draw our attention to it when considering what tune we are going to play with our hp formula.
Phil Thomas
Member
Posts: 173
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 4:57 pm

Post by Phil Thomas »

With the state of the pot holed roads around here, smaller wheels would be a disaster.

Regards to all,
Phil Thomas
User avatar
Herb
Member
Posts: 1808
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2008 5:49 pm
Location: Lutterworth, Midlands

Post by Herb »

slparry wrote:The Japanese widely went down to 16" wheels in the 80's and I for one hated them, they always seemed prone to feeling like they were tucking under.

The current 17" seems a much better compromise :)
Ahhh, but 16.5 might be better still, like the MotoGP bikes.
********Jim********
---------------------------
2006 'Colgate' R1200s
User avatar
slparry
Moderator
Posts: 6730
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2008 7:19 pm
Location: Wrexham
Contact:

Post by slparry »

Herb wrote:
slparry wrote:The Japanese widely went down to 16" wheels in the 80's and I for one hated them, they always seemed prone to feeling like they were tucking under.

The current 17" seems a much better compromise :)
Ahhh, but 16.5 might be better still, like the MotoGP bikes.
Possibly, but balanced out that we need more stability than those guys .... maybe ... ish :)
--
Steve Parry


Current fleet: '14 F800GS, '87 R80RS, '03 R1100S BoxerCup, '15 R1200RT LE Dynamic, '90 K1, '05 K1200S
Post Reply Previous topicNext topic